FX.co ★ Trading plan for 03/28/2019

It seems that no one has understood why the House of Commons had arranged this whole farce. The parliamentarians made a strong-willed decision and rejected all the alternative for the relocation of the European home, which was already eight. After lengthy disputes and discussions, the elected representatives of Her Majesty's people came to the conclusion that a way out without an agreement was a bad idea. Yes, and the abolition of Brexit which they were rejected. They are well aware that such a decision will cause bewilderment of voters as well as they all will have to complete their political career. A second referendum, approximately from the same plane as the cancellation of Brexit, was also rejected. Thus, the best people of the country sitting in the House of Commons unequivocally expressed that it was necessary to "divorce" only with an agreement. The only trouble is that the existing agreement categorically does not suit them. During a divorce, it often happens that one side of this most pleasant process wants to take over everything — the yacht and the rusty bicycle. Europe immediately declared that there would be no more negotiations on Brexit. There is an agreement, and London either accepts it or not. Period. In her turn, Theresa May said that for the third time, she would submit an agreement to the House of Commons on March 29, that is the last day when it can be done. After Brexit, she would immediately resign. In fact, voting in the House of Commons did not change anything. So, there is still uncertainty on the issue in the market.